1. Jake, the wolf suckling commercial was for Quiznos? UGH! I must've totally blocked that ad from my memory.
Well, these baby ads are far too creepy for me...if you can't do an ad well, then don't do it at all, I keep expecting that baby's head to do a 360 and then projectile vomit pea soup!
Quiznos have no niche whatsoever, they have an identity crisis and overcompensate by trying to be hip and clever by scouring the web for small and trendy art sites {like the guys who were commissioned to do the Hamster ads}.....just show the darn sandwich and be done with it!

Posted at 4:13PM on Jun 16th 2005 by JIMEZSMOOT

2. Yes, I agree. I am very accomodating but this one turned me off big time!

Posted at 4:22PM on Jun 16th 2005 by Michael Lehman

3. Looks like a bad photoshop job.

Posted at 4:22PM on Jun 16th 2005 by dill

4. I agree. The worst. And what was up with his mouth? Talking babies just don't do it for me anymore...actually...never did.

Posted at 4:22PM on Jun 16th 2005 by Rolf Gruntey

5. this is an older ad.

Posted at 4:22PM on Jun 16th 2005 by justin

6. They should save their money. No one here ever gets those Quiznos ads, let alone the baby from Who Framed Roger Rabbit saying, "Yeah, I work out." I don't think friend mushrooms are the kind of mushrooms those guys were eating when they greenlighted that one.

Posted at 4:22PM on Jun 16th 2005 by Frank

7. It's Baby Bob from the failed CBS sitcom (and an older commercial as was pointed out). Slate did a piece on it recently.

Posted at 4:22PM on Jun 16th 2005 by David

8. Older and horrible. But that seems to be the Quizno's niche. Remember those awful singing hamster commercials they had a while ago. Scary!

Posted at 4:22PM on Jun 16th 2005 by Deidre Woollard

9. It is always so lame when an advertiser shows a commercial that we've all seen before.

Posted at 4:22PM on Jun 16th 2005 by Josh Hallett

10. This was a horrible ad bordering on pedophilia. Imagine if it had been a girl baby and a man flirting with her. Ugh.

Posted at 4:22PM on Jun 16th 2005 by Niki

11. Okay first of all, that commercial took A LONG TIME TO make because it's hard to keep a cute little baby still for hours, and sorry they arnt as creative as a regular boring commercial. And Quiznos subs are great tasting, and subway has bitten off them by having toasted subs now, but no sub place can compete with a quiznos sub. They are sooooooooooooooooo good.

Posted at 4:22PM on Jun 16th 2005 by Jenna Brooke

12. How can anyone think that talking babies do it for ANY consumer these days! It's just soooooooooo old! ps - i love quiznos' sandwiches.

Posted at 4:22PM on Jun 16th 2005 by BrianB

13. I kinda think these are cute. Certainly compared to last year's commercials (the guy sucking on the wolf teat...THAT was a good idea).

Posted at 4:22PM on Jun 16th 2005 by Jake Cranston

14. Why don't we lay off Baby Bob. He is much nicer and more fun to watch than most commercials. I have seen some really gross ads lately. I think Baby Bob is cute and I for one enjoy watching Him. Give Quiznos a pat on the back.

Posted at 2:09PM on Aug 10th 2005 by Jill B

15. Baby Bob is cool. Yes, I do understand the concerns for pedophilia, but I respectfully disagree here. First of all, Baby Bob is very intelligent (35 years old wisdom) and if you pay attention, you will realize Baby Bob hit on her first, not the other way. Yes, he is hunky, just look at his six packs.

Look, if you must judge this ads in serious content, then you might as well do that for every other ads and TV shows we have on air.

Posted at 4:26PM on Sep 24th 2005 by Richard

16. What is this "lay off Baby Bob"??? The show was a bomb, and these Quizno ads turn me off.

STOP THE NONSENSE!!! STOP THE BABY BOB ADS!!!

Posted at 6:50PM on Nov 8th 2005 by Sylvester

17. What is this "lay off Baby Bob"??? The show was a bomb, and these Quizno ads turn me off.

STOP THE NONSENSE!!! STOP THE BABY BOB ADS!!!

Posted at 6:53PM on Nov 8th 2005 by Sylvester