<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AdJab</title>
<link>http://www.adjab.com</link>
<description>AdJab</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Blogsmith, LLC. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>Microsoft spends a lot of money to wow you with Vista</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/31/microsoft-spends-a-lot-of-money-to-wow-you-with-vista/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/31/microsoft-spends-a-lot-of-money-to-wow-you-with-vista/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/31/microsoft-spends-a-lot-of-money-to-wow-you-with-vista/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/budgets/" rel="tag">Budgets</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/campaign-launch/" rel="tag">Campaign Launch</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/windows_vista_002-ig.jpg" />Forget what you might have heard about <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2007/01/29/vista_drm_cracked.html">already-cracked DRMs</a>, ethically questionable blogger relations or any other problems surrounding the new Microsoft Vista operating system. The software has finally arrived and its launch is being accompanied by a $500 million <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/30/technology/30soft.html?ex=1327813200&amp;en=3f75108f797955cc&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss">marketing push</a>. That includes not only TV, print and online buys but also sponsored games and huge publicity events like the one featuring Microsoft's Steve Ballmer and, of course, Bill Gates. Everyone is out to make this the biggest product launch in Microsoft history, which in their mind equals best. <br /><br />Microsoft is just one of a number of companies who have decided to eschew ad campaigns with celebrities in favor of ad campaigns with some <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/30/business/media/30adco.html?ex=1327813200&amp;en=e007489c606094f8&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss">not-quite celebrities</a>. They're using a relatively unknown comedian named Demetri Martin to promote Vista to the tech-savvy, Comedy Central watching crowd. More and more companies are using non-celebs for their campaigns as a way to break through the ad clutter in a more down-to-earth way.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/31/microsoft-spends-a-lot-of-money-to-wow-you-with-vista/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/745763/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/31/microsoft-spends-a-lot-of-money-to-wow-you-with-vista/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-31T10:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>AdAge In 3 Sets of 20 Seconds</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/30/adage-in-3-sets-of-20-seconds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/30/adage-in-3-sets-of-20-seconds/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/30/adage-in-3-sets-of-20-seconds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/budgets/" rel="tag">Budgets</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/sexy/" rel="tag">Sexy</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/adage-in-60-seconds/" rel="tag">AdAge in 60 Seconds</a></p><ul>
    <li><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/static2.jpg"  alt="" />There's about to be an advertising <a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=114584">show down</a> between K-Y and Zestra, both of which make products to help with female sexual arousal. Zestra is a small brand but it's hoping that the wealth of clinical research it has done will help it compete.</li>
    <li>A bunch of middle-aged or outright old and rich white guys, all of whom preside over professional sports leagues, <a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=114613">talk branding</a> and other issues. </li>
    <li>I don't think "prepare" is the right word. I actually think TV stations are <a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=114554">salivating over</a> the estimated $1 billion that's about to be dropped on the upcoming Presidential campaign. One way they could handle the overflow of candidates looking for ad time is to divert some of them to the web.</li>
</ul><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/30/adage-in-3-sets-of-20-seconds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/745117/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/30/adage-in-3-sets-of-20-seconds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-30T12:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>AdAge In 2 Sets of 30 Seconds</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/29/adage-in-2-sets-of-30-seconds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/29/adage-in-2-sets-of-30-seconds/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/29/adage-in-2-sets-of-30-seconds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/agencies/" rel="tag">Agencies</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/budgets/" rel="tag">Budgets</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/adage-in-60-seconds/" rel="tag">AdAge in 60 Seconds</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/op-ed/" rel="tag">Op-ed</a></p><ul>
    <li><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/static.jpg"  alt="" />Microsoft is on the <a href="http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=114589">cusp of launching</a> a $500 million campaign for the debut of its Vista operating system. That buys a lot of TV spots and banner ads but, ironically, only about a dozen copies of the software itself.</li>
    <li>With all the stories that have been printed lately about how Crispin Porter &amp; Bogusky and how its work hasn't actually helped its clients, it's not that surprising to see a <a href="http://adage.com/columns/article.php?article_id=114603">story like this</a> that reminds us how wonderful and creative they are. <br /></li>
    <li>Marketers are <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article.php?article_id=114567">questioning</a> just who the glamorous productions that are the upfront presentations are actually meant for. Networks could start to rein in how extravagant their shows are in the future under pressure that these are more shows than they are business meetings. </li>
</ul><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/29/adage-in-2-sets-of-30-seconds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/744344/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/29/adage-in-2-sets-of-30-seconds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-29T10:30:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>101 Dumbest Moments in Business</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/24/101-dumbest-moments-in-business/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/24/101-dumbest-moments-in-business/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/24/101-dumbest-moments-in-business/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/agencies/" rel="tag">Agencies</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/budgets/" rel="tag">Budgets</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/funny/" rel="tag">Funny</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/product-placement/" rel="tag">Product Placement</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/sexy/" rel="tag">Sexy</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/viral/" rel="tag">Viral</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/indoor/" rel="tag">Indoor</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/online/" rel="tag">Online</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/outdoor/" rel="tag">Outdoor</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/print/" rel="tag">Print</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/radio/" rel="tag">Radio</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/corporate/" rel="tag">Corporate</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/campaign-launch/" rel="tag">Campaign Launch</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/word-of-mouth/" rel="tag">Word of Mouth</a></p><p><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="150" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/walmartlogo2.jpg" alt="" />So many dumb moments in business, so little time. But <em>Business 2.0</em> mag has their picks for the <a href="http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/biz2/0701/gallery.101dumbest_2007/index.html">101 dumbest of 2006</a>.</p>
<p>Wal-Mart is #1, for hiring a big firm to create their "Candidate Wal-Mart" campaign. #2 is Northwest Airlines, for giving their employees a "How To Save Money" booklet after laying them off. #3 is the contest McDonald's held in Japan, with the winners getting free mp3 players with a virus on them. The rest of the top 10 are GM, Kazakhstan, Steve Wynn, <em>The New York Times</em>, Spirit Air, Porter County, and Comcast. </p>
<p>There are 101 in all, so grab a hot beverage and get comfortable. You can't see the entire list on one page, which is a little annoying, but there is a handy scroll function at the bottom.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/24/101-dumbest-moments-in-business/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/741377/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/24/101-dumbest-moments-in-business/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>bad advertising</category><category>business 2.0</category><category>Business2.0</category><category>comcast</category><category>general motors</category><category>mcdonald's</category><category>new york times</category><category>porter county</category><category>spirit air</category><category>wal-mart</category><dc:creator>Bob Sassone</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-24T11:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>AdAge In 60 Seconds</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/22/adage-in-60-seconds2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/22/adage-in-60-seconds2/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/22/adage-in-60-seconds2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/agencies/" rel="tag">Agencies</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/budgets/" rel="tag">Budgets</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/gripes/" rel="tag">Gripes</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/print/" rel="tag">Print</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/adage-in-60-seconds/" rel="tag">AdAge in 60 Seconds</a></p><ul>
    <li><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/static.jpg" />Mediaedge:cia <a href="http://adage.com/article.php?article_id=114398">has been picked</a> by Federated Department Stores as their new agency of record. The change came after the complete lack of review and will include national planning and buying for Macy's.</li>
    <li>The drastically reduced print spending by major auto companies is at least one factor - albeit <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=114419">likely a big one</a> - in Time's decision to cut almost 300 staffers. The decreased ad revenue was just too big a hit for the publisher to take. <br /></li>
    <li>It should be as no surprise to anyone who's seen the spots that Orville "Deadenbacher" is creeping consumers <a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=114434">way the heck out</a>. A reanimated dead guy who wears as iPod while he's microwaving popcorn...yeah...it's creepy. </li>
</ul><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/22/adage-in-60-seconds2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/739145/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/22/adage-in-60-seconds2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>federated department stores</category><category>mcy's</category><category>mediaedge</category><category>orville redenbacher</category><category>time</category><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-22T10:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Cross Promotion Junction: 1/19/06</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/cross-promotion-junction-1-19-06/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/cross-promotion-junction-1-19-06/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/cross-promotion-junction-1-19-06/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/budgets/" rel="tag">Budgets</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/online/" rel="tag">Online</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/wireless/" rel="tag">Wireless</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/streaming-video/" rel="tag">Streaming Video</a></p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/television2.jpg" alt="" />Introductory Note: Rounding up all of the goodness that is the world of television cross-promotion.<br /><br /></em>Sprint will be delivering "24"-related content to its mobile phone users to <a href="http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/recent_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003532162">promote</a> the just-premiered sixth season of the show. That includes streaming video, games and more but unfortunately doesn't give users the ability to get a ringtone of Jack Bauer saying "Pick up the phone or millions of people will die" which I think is what we all want.<br /><br />One good thing about the existing upfront system is that when advertisers pay a relatively cheap price for a show and then it winds up being a decent success, <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/01142007/business/ugly_betty_is_best_ad_deal_business_don_kaplan.htm">as in the case</a> of "Ugly Betty", they wind up looking like geniuses. The show has become the biggest value on TV, with ads running about $1.85 for every 100 veiwers.<br /><br />I have to believe that the biggest reason the creative team behind "Lost" have announced their intentions to set an end-date for the show is to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/14/AR2007011401122.html?nav=rss_email/components">lure back viewers</a>. Some watchers had written off the show, signaling their frustration with unanswered questions, mysterious polar bears and mysteries that seem to go absolutely no where. By showing they are thinking of wrapping things up and actually answering those questions. <em></em><p><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/cross-promotion-junction-1-19-06/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cross Promotion Junction: 1/19/06</em></a></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/cross-promotion-junction-1-19-06/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/737079/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/cross-promotion-junction-1-19-06/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-19T18:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>20 years of Super Bowl ad stats</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/20-years-of-super-bowl-ad-stats/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/20-years-of-super-bowl-ad-stats/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/20-years-of-super-bowl-ad-stats/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/budgets/" rel="tag">Budgets</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/super-bowl-2007/" rel="tag">Super Bowl 2007</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/bowl_xli.jpg" />Some interesting facts from this <a href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx">eMarketer report</a> on Super Bowl advertising in the last 20 years:<br />
<ul>
    <li>Over 11 hours of airtime has been devoted just to the commercials.</li>
    <li>221 different advertisers have bought spots.</li>
    <li>Over 1,400 spots have aired.</li>
    <li>$1.72 billion has been spent by advertisers just on buying the spots. That doesn't include production costs.</li>
    <li>Just the top five advertisers have spent $613.4 million.</li>
    <li>The cost of a spot has quadrupled in that time. That means it was roughly $500,000 or so for a spot in 1987.</li>
</ul>
Have fun factoring this year's spending into that.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?1004478>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/20-years-of-super-bowl-ad-stats/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/738868/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/20-years-of-super-bowl-ad-stats/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-19T10:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Email losing display ads</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/17/email-losing-display-ads/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/17/email-losing-display-ads/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/17/email-losing-display-ads/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/budgets/" rel="tag">Budgets</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/online/" rel="tag">Online</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/email.jpg"  alt="" />Online email services such as those provided by Yahoo and MSN have long been bastions of banner advertising. Now, it seems, the percentage of display ads being claimed by email sites is dropping. Just 44.2 percent of display ads were devoted to email sites in December, which was down from 47.5 and 51.1 in the two months prior. Even with smaller overall percentages Yahoo continues to dominate the market, accounting for 36.4 of ads in December compared to MSN Hotmail's 6.4 percent. Google, of course, relies on contextual keyword ads and so doesn't factor as a player in this market.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticleHomePage&amp;art_aid=53860>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/17/email-losing-display-ads/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/736882/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/17/email-losing-display-ads/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>email</category><category>hotmail</category><category>msn</category><category>yahoo</category><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-17T09:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Realtors launch campaign</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/11/realtors-launch-campaign/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/11/realtors-launch-campaign/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/11/realtors-launch-campaign/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/budgets/" rel="tag">Budgets</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/campaign-launch/" rel="tag">Campaign Launch</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/for-sale-sign1106.jpg"  alt="" />Apparently the National Association of Realtors feels that it's not high energy prices, increasing debt load or the problems being to creep up in home purchase lending practices that are causing the drop in new home buys. In actuality it was the lack of advertising. To right that obvious wrong the group <a href="http://www.smartmoney.com/bn/ON/index.cfm?story=ON-20070109-000516-1257">has launched</a> a $40 million campaign to encourage people to go out and buy a house. The NAR wants people to know there's plenty of housing inventory available at a good price since sales are down in the past year, something that I might not be so quick to flaunt since plenty of homes being available means not only are there market forces at work but it also means realtors haven't been successful in either getting people to buy or helping people to sell homes.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.smartmoney.com/bn/ON/index.cfm?story=ON-20070109-000516-1257>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/11/realtors-launch-campaign/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/733579/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/11/realtors-launch-campaign/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>housing</category><category>realtors</category><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-11T16:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>AdAge In 60 Seconds</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/09/adage-in-60-seconds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/09/adage-in-60-seconds/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/09/adage-in-60-seconds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/budgets/" rel="tag">Budgets</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/online/" rel="tag">Online</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/adage-in-60-seconds/" rel="tag">AdAge in 60 Seconds</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a></p><ul>
    <li><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/static2.jpg"  alt="" />Yet another prediction for 2007. This one comes from TNS Media Intelligence, who <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article.php?article_id=114172">forecasts</a> only a 2.6 percent rise in ad spending this year. Keep in mind, though, that TNS does not include keyword search buying in their calculations. The firm also says inflation is being held down by expanding inventory. <br /></li>
    <li>Kevin Rose and Jay Adelson of Digg get a <a href="http://adage.com/digital/article.php?article_id=114137">big wet sloppy blow job</a> in this interview about Digg competitors, the Diggnation podcast and their new company Revision3. And what's with the "AdAge Digital rang up the duo..." line? Yeah, it was spur of the moment and they both were around with press-ready quotes. Mmmm-hmmm.</li>
    <li>Google keeps chugging along <a href="http://adage.com/digital/article.php?article_id=114112">despite the efforts</a> of all sorts of competition. And their competitors are spending a whole lot more (Google spends <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/blogtalk/blogtalk/wpn-58-20070108IsGoogleGoingtoStartMarketing.html">practically nothing</a>) on marketing their products but have little market share strength to show for it.</li>
    <li>Despite hopes that it would go away, the issue of hiring minorities is likely going to <a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=114175">stick around</a> in 2007. Renewed vigor in the Democratic party and other factors are going to take the issue to a more national level.</li>
</ul><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://adage.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/09/adage-in-60-seconds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/732450/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/09/adage-in-60-seconds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>digg</category><category>google</category><category>jay adelson</category><category>kevin rose</category><category>minority hiring</category><category>tns</category><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-09T09:30:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Sprintel is agitating their own dots</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/06/sprintel-is-agitating-their-own-dots/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/06/sprintel-is-agitating-their-own-dots/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/06/sprintel-is-agitating-their-own-dots/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/agencies/" rel="tag">Agencies</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/budgets/" rel="tag">Budgets</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/ads-we-love/" rel="tag">Ads We Love</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/corporate/" rel="tag">Corporate</a></p>Ok, this is one of my favorite commercials. "Are you agitating my dots...?" Classic. I knew a guy at my last job who would have done exactly what the guy with the cake did in this spot, and he even looked like him. Enough about dots. Sprint/Nextel is thinking about <a href="http://www.adpulp.com/archives/2007/01/why_is_sprintne.php">combining their account</a> at one agency, which puts $1 Billion at stake. They are hoping that by consolidating their dots and connecting those dots with the dots of only one other agency, they will inspire the dots to be fresher, to get the dots to think in new ways and maybe create a bunch more little dots to run around and pick things up over the push-to-talk service (and boost sales). For your enjoyment, one more time, and because I love it so much: <br />
<div align="center"> <a style="padding-left: 0px;" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/19rVKy_pfFU" class="abp-objtab"></a><a class="abp-objtab" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/19rVKy_pfFU" style="padding-left: 0px;"></a><object width="425" height="350">
<param value="http://www.youtube.com/v/19rVKy_pfFU" name="movie" />
<param value="transparent" name="wmode" /><embed width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/19rVKy_pfFU"></embed></object> </div><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.adpulp.com/archives/2007/01/why_is_sprintne.php>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/06/sprintel-is-agitating-their-own-dots/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/729842/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/06/sprintel-is-agitating-their-own-dots/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>ad</category><category>agency</category><category>agitating</category><category>billion</category><category>consolidation</category><category>dots</category><category>Nextel</category><category>Sprint</category><dc:creator>Ryan Carter</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-06T16:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Getting ready for the Super Bowl</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/04/getting-ready-for-the-super-bowl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/04/getting-ready-for-the-super-bowl/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/04/getting-ready-for-the-super-bowl/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/budgets/" rel="tag">Budgets</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/super-bowl-2007/" rel="tag">Super Bowl 2007</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/bowl_xli.jpg"  alt="" />The Super Bowl is fast approaching, as is the angry mob that will lynch Rex Grossman in Daley Plaza if he doesn't pull his head out of his hinder and turn in a good playoff performance. But we're not hear to talk football (sometimes it seems Grossman isn't either) we're here to talk about the commercials that will be scattered throughout the big game. So what can we expect?<br /><br />Well first off, while CBS might be able to get a few suckers buyers to pony up 2.6 million Junior Bacon Cheeseburgers for a 30-second spot, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/01/03/news/funny/superbowl_ads/index.htm?section=money_latest">some expect</a> the average price paid by advertisers is more likely to be about 2.2 million 5-piece Chicken Nuggets. Everyday that passes where there's still word that even the first half isn't completely sold out, meaning there's likely plenty of inventory in the second half, that average goes down by a couple hundred dollars. <br /><br />Most marketers just want to create something memorable that will justify not only the 2.6 million Crispy Chicken Sandwich ante but also the 2 million Medium Frosties that the production of a super-duper Super Bowl Cost can cost. Diamond Nuts has <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/advertising/2007-01-02-super-bowl-usat_x.htm?csp=34">just that in mind</a> as they create an ad for their third Super Bowl appearance, one that will star singer Robert Goulet. At least Emerald, even if they haven't announced details, is saying there will be some sort of web execution following the game.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/04/getting-ready-for-the-super-bowl/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/729091/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/04/getting-ready-for-the-super-bowl/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-04T14:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>France allows retailers to advertise</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/02/france-allows-retailers-to-advertise/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/02/france-allows-retailers-to-advertise/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/02/france-allows-retailers-to-advertise/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/budgets/" rel="tag">Budgets</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/television2.jpg"  alt="" />When I first read the headline of <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/12/29/business/retail.php">this story</a> on French retailers finally being allowed to advertise I thought I must be missing something or reading it wrong. Surely, I thought to myself, retailers in France have been able to advertise their stores before. After I told myself not to call me Shirley I read the article and found out that until 12:01 AM of the first day of 2007, retailers were forbidden to advertise on television. The ban was put in place to protect the advertising revenue of newspapers in the country but in 2004 the European Union called the ban a restriction on free trade. Since then commercials have slowly begun appearing on cable and other specialty channels but now, for the first time, the ads will be allowed on "mainstream" TV channels. The lifted restriction is expected to increase not only ad spending but consumer spending as well now that supermarkets, malls and others can hawk their services. And, just as the French officials first suspected, that will likely lead to smaller budgets for radio, print and other media.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/12/29/business/retail.php>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/02/france-allows-retailers-to-advertise/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/727757/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/02/france-allows-retailers-to-advertise/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>france</category><category>malls</category><category>retailers</category><category>supermarket</category><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-02T16:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Drug cos upped spending 9% in 2006</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/31/drug-cos-upped-spending-9-in-2006/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/31/drug-cos-upped-spending-9-in-2006/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/31/drug-cos-upped-spending-9-in-2006/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/budgets/" rel="tag">Budgets</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.adjab.com/media/2006/12/viagra55.jpg" alt="" />No, you weren't imagining things. You really did see more drug ads in 2006. That's because pharmaceutical marketers upped their ad spending by nine percent, from $4.1 billion in 2005 to $4.9 billing this year. Sepracor's Lunestra marketing accounted for a good deal of that, spending 78 percent more this year than it did in 2005. Viagra also bounced back to mount a comeback, raising its output to $65 million, a level that doctors say can be unhealthy if it lasts for too long.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://adweek.com/aw/national/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003525678&amp;imw=Y>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/31/drug-cos-upped-spending-9-in-2006/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/725744/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/31/drug-cos-upped-spending-9-in-2006/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>lunestra</category><category>viagra</category><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-12-31T10:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Online prices rising too high too fast</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/27/online-prices-rising-too-high-too-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/27/online-prices-rising-too-high-too-fast/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/27/online-prices-rising-too-high-too-fast/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/budgets/" rel="tag">Budgets</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/online/" rel="tag">Online</a></p>Where's Alan Greenspan when you need him. There are now <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/25/technology/25ecom.html?ex=1324702800&amp;en=c4cec948363f4c98&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss">dire warnings</a> that online advertising prices are rising at an irrationally accelerated rate. But let's be clear about what we're discussing. It's more the big portal sites are are jacking up prices and big publishers who are trying to make a web page equal a TV spot in revenue who are leading so most of that increase. While budgets are certainly going up they're being focused on big sites that get a ton of traffic or on networks that get reach by adding up lots of smaller sites. There's still a lot of untapped inventory out there on non-affiliated blogs and other sites that might be attractive buys if the marketers would spend the time to find them. And there are a number of companies who haven't seriously committed to online advertising because it doesn't serve their branding needs. <br /><br />So yes, there is some concern that speculative money could lead to "Bubble 2.0" but I don't see that happening anytime soon.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/25/technology/25ecom.html?ex=1324702800&amp;en=c4cec948363f4c98&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/27/online-prices-rising-too-high-too-fast/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/724821/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/27/online-prices-rising-too-high-too-fast/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-12-27T13:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Online jobs ads now outpace print</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/21/online-jobs-ads-now-outpace-print/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/21/online-jobs-ads-now-outpace-print/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/21/online-jobs-ads-now-outpace-print/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/budgets/" rel="tag">Budgets</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/online/" rel="tag">Online</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.adjab.com/media/2006/12/want_ads.jpg"  alt="" />More bad news for the print media industry. Online jobs advertising spending <a href="http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticleHomePage&amp;art_aid=52814">has surpassed</a> that of print for the first time. And it's quite a leap - about $500 million. That's going nowhere but up according to estimates that have online spending being about twice the spending on print ads by 2011. Most of that growth is expected to come from small and local businesses looking for part-time or hourly help, an area that most of the major online sites such as <a href="http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/">HotJobs</a> and <a href="http://www.monster.com">Monster.com</a> have made major moves into recently. Niche sites that focus on specific types of job listings have accounted for much of the growth since they allow for a more social experience in addition to the listings.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticleHomePage&amp;art_aid=52814>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/21/online-jobs-ads-now-outpace-print/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/722256/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/21/online-jobs-ads-now-outpace-print/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>hotjobs</category><category>monster.com</category><category>online classifieds</category><category>OnlineClassifieds</category><category>yahoo</category><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-12-21T12:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>AdAge In 60 Seconds</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/20/adage-in-60-seconds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/20/adage-in-60-seconds/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/20/adage-in-60-seconds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/agencies/" rel="tag">Agencies</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/budgets/" rel="tag">Budgets</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/adage-in-60-seconds/" rel="tag">AdAge in 60 Seconds</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/corporate/" rel="tag">Corporate</a></p><ul>
    <li><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.adjab.com/media/2006/12/static3.gif"  alt="" />Time Inc. decided to get started early on the layoffs they had planned for January. They gave <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=113968">pink slips</a> to 27 mid-level staffers in the consumer marketing department. <br /></li>
    <li>Ford has an <a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=113961">$80 million push</a> lined up for their Edge CUV. One of the biggest aspects of the campaign will be a MSN-hosted <a href="http://fordedge.msn.com/">microsite</a> that will list get-togethers for adults. Microsoft has guaranteed Ford a certain amount of traffic to the site but that number hasn't been disclosed. <br /></li>
    <li>Target <a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=113966">has signed</a> Grupo Gallegos for a new interactive project. The Hispanic agency had previously been in the running to do some work for Wal-Mart. <br /></li>
</ul><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://adage.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/20/adage-in-60-seconds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/722131/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/20/adage-in-60-seconds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>edge cuv</category><category>ford</category><category>grupo gallegos</category><category>GrupoGallegos</category><category>target</category><category>time inc</category><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-12-20T09:05:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Super Bowl nearly sold out of commercial time</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/18/super-bowl-nearly-sold-out-of-commercial-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/18/super-bowl-nearly-sold-out-of-commercial-time/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/18/super-bowl-nearly-sold-out-of-commercial-time/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/budgets/" rel="tag">Budgets</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/super-bowl-2007/" rel="tag">Super Bowl 2007</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.adjab.com/media/2006/12/football925.jpg"  alt="" />Reports are saying that 80 percent of inventory for next year's Super Bowl is <a href="http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/recent_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003522665">sold out</a>, with on CBS executive saying the first half was almost completely gone. Prices are reportedly reaching north of $2.6 million. Ads within pre-game programming starts at $100,000 for a 30-second spot during the noon start to the festivities and get more expensive as the clock gets closer to the 6:20 PM game kickoff.<br /><br />Remember, that's anywhere from $100,000 to $2.6 million for 30 seconds of TV advertising.<br /><br />I think I just threw up in my mouth.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/recent_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003522665>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/18/super-bowl-nearly-sold-out-of-commercial-time/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/720792/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/18/super-bowl-nearly-sold-out-of-commercial-time/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-12-18T17:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>AdAge In 60 Seconds</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/15/adage-in-60-seconds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/15/adage-in-60-seconds/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/15/adage-in-60-seconds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/budgets/" rel="tag">Budgets</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/adage-in-60-seconds/" rel="tag">AdAge in 60 Seconds</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/corporate/" rel="tag">Corporate</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/consumer-generated/" rel="tag">Consumer Generated</a></p><ul>
    <li><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.adjab.com/media/2006/12/static5.jpg"  alt="" />Procter &amp; Gamble says they <a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=113813">will not</a> cut marketing budgets haphazardly in order to meet goals for profit margins. Instead they'll simply focus on making sure they're getting the best ROI for their dollar, which is sort of smart.</li>
    <li>Dove is asking its <a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=113811">customers to submit</a> their own ads for possible airing during the next Academy Awards broadcast. Specifically, they're looking for 30-second spots about their Dove Cream Oil Body Wash that are submitted to <a href="http://DoveCreamOil.com">DoveCreamOil.com</a>.</li>
    <li>Following a disappointing ad performance in 2006, Primedia is <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=113801">considering</a> selling off its Channel One educational broadcasting network. They've reportedly been talking to companies such as Disney and others about taking over the station, which is sent to classrooms around the country.</li>
</ul><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://adage.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/15/adage-in-60-seconds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/719484/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/15/adage-in-60-seconds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-12-15T12:29:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>TV actually fueling spending growth</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/14/tv-actually-fueling-spending-growth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/14/tv-actually-fueling-spending-growth/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/14/tv-actually-fueling-spending-growth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/budgets/" rel="tag">Budgets</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.adjab.com/media/2006/12/television2.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />Despite predictions of doom, most marketers are still <a href="http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticleHomePage&amp;art_aid=52553">planning on upping</a> their television advertising budgets in 2007. TV is expected to account for about 46 percent of the increase in spending next year. There are a number of factors to this:<br />
<ol>
    <li>Internet prices are lower than TV and allow you to get more for you dollar. So while online spending is increasing, it's not that surprising that things are taking a short breather in terms of raw numbers. <br /></li>
    <li>There are more TV channels than ever and more being added all the time. That means more inventory is available at a higher price.</li>
    <li>TV just plain costs more and they're not afraid to raise prices because they're TV and have that kind of clout.</li>
</ol><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticleHomePage&amp;art_aid=52553>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/14/tv-actually-fueling-spending-growth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/718638/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/14/tv-actually-fueling-spending-growth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-12-14T13:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item></channel></rss>