<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AdJab</title>
<link>http://www.adjab.com</link>
<description>AdJab</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Blogsmith, LLC. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>I'd like to buy the world synth coke</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/27/id-like-to-buy-the-world-synth-coke/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/27/id-like-to-buy-the-world-synth-coke/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/27/id-like-to-buy-the-world-synth-coke/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/funny/" rel="tag">Funny</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/online/" rel="tag">Online</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a></p><p>The hell?</p>
<p>Is this a real commercial? It's from the 1980s, and it's an ad for something called "Synth coke," which seems to be like real cocaine, only not as expensive (but who knows if the effects were the same, better, or worse). The ad, which has all of the charm and production values of 80s porn movies, says that it's the way to a girl's heart (and other things) and that it can be found in "adult bookstores and boutiques throughout Manhattan."</p>
<p>I don't remember seeing this on VH-1's <em>I Love The 80s</em>.</p>
<p> </p>
<embed width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PDYaU46g6rY"></embed>
<p> </p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/">Boing Boing</a>]</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/27/id-like-to-buy-the-world-synth-coke/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/743255/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/27/id-like-to-buy-the-world-synth-coke/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>80s commercials</category><category>boing boing</category><category>cocaine</category><category>drugs</category><category>synthcoke</category><dc:creator>Bob Sassone</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-27T08:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Who wants to smell the Wall Street Journal?</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/26/who-wants-to-smell-the-wall-street-journal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/26/who-wants-to-smell-the-wall-street-journal/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/26/who-wants-to-smell-the-wall-street-journal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/print/" rel="tag">Print</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/campaign-launch/" rel="tag">Campaign Launch</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a></p><p><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="150" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/wsjpaper.jpg" />No, it's not a new game show on NBC featuring a celebrity host and a bunch of girls with giant noses that might contain money, it's a new <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=114528">advertising idea</a> from the folks at the financial paper.</p>
<p>As Chris <a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/26/adage-in-63-seconds/">mentioned earlier</a>, they're a new version of the old "scratch and sniff" ads called "rub and sniff," which actually sounds like some sex position, or maybe a play that will be run in the Super Bowl coming up in February. These ads will use a technology different from the typical peel and smell ads (like cologne ads) you see in mags like <em>GQ</em> and <em>Esquire</em>. It's a rub, not a scratch. </p>
<p>For now the ads will just be included in newspaper inserts, not as part of the newspaper itself. </p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/26/who-wants-to-smell-the-wall-street-journal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/743176/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/26/who-wants-to-smell-the-wall-street-journal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>adage.com</category><category>chocolate</category><category>cologne</category><category>money</category><category>perfume</category><category>rub and sniff</category><category>scratch and sniff</category><category>wsj.com</category><dc:creator>Bob Sassone</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-26T18:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Illinois lawmakers want to curb alcohol ads that target kids</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/26/illinois-lawmakers-want-to-curb-alcohol-ads-that-target-kids/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/26/illinois-lawmakers-want-to-curb-alcohol-ads-that-target-kids/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/26/illinois-lawmakers-want-to-curb-alcohol-ads-that-target-kids/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/mikeshardlemonade.jpg"  alt="" />An Illinois consumer watchdog group has urged makers of alcoholic drinks they feel are being marketed to kids to stop doing so reports the <em>Chicago Tribune</em>. The Illinois Alcoholism and Drug Dependence Association has called on makers of drinks like Mike's Hard Lemonade and others to curb practices that they say make the drinks appealing to kids. The group is using the term "alcopop" to describe such drinks. A 2003 FTC report said there was no evidence kids in particular were being targeted by ads for these products, but anecdotes in the story suggest that consumption is widespread among teens.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-070125alcopop,1,5536002.story?track=rss>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/26/illinois-lawmakers-want-to-curb-alcohol-ads-that-target-kids/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/742665/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/26/illinois-lawmakers-want-to-curb-alcohol-ads-that-target-kids/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-26T13:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Twin tree towers burning</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/26/twin-tree-towers-burning/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/26/twin-tree-towers-burning/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/26/twin-tree-towers-burning/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/print/" rel="tag">Print</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a></p><p><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="150" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/treeks.jpg" />I'm not sure what to think of <a href="http://adsoftheworld.com/media/print/fondation_nicolas_hulot_9/11?size=_original">this ad</a>. It was created for an environmental organization and shows two trees standing side by side, their trunks smoking and spewing flames like the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001. The text on the ad reads: "For nature, everyday is 9/11."</p>
<p>Setting aside the argument of whether or not the ad is insensitive, or if it's too soon to evoke such images, I wonder if the ad actually makes a clear point. I understand it wants to demonstrate how the environment is "under attack," but there are no specifics. The idea of comparing it to 9/11 may be jarring and controversial, which is obviously the point, but I want more detail. I want to know exactly how the events of that day and our treatment of the environment are similar. I have no problem with an ad trying to shock people, but such an ad would have a much larger impact if it was more obvious why such a connection is being made.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/26/twin-tree-towers-burning/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/743017/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/26/twin-tree-towers-burning/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>9/11</category><category>fire</category><category>nature</category><category>smoke</category><category>trees</category><dc:creator>Adam Finley</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-26T12:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>101 Dumbest Moments in Business</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/24/101-dumbest-moments-in-business/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/24/101-dumbest-moments-in-business/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/24/101-dumbest-moments-in-business/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/agencies/" rel="tag">Agencies</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/budgets/" rel="tag">Budgets</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/funny/" rel="tag">Funny</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/product-placement/" rel="tag">Product Placement</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/sexy/" rel="tag">Sexy</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/viral/" rel="tag">Viral</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/indoor/" rel="tag">Indoor</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/online/" rel="tag">Online</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/outdoor/" rel="tag">Outdoor</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/print/" rel="tag">Print</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/radio/" rel="tag">Radio</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/corporate/" rel="tag">Corporate</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/campaign-launch/" rel="tag">Campaign Launch</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/word-of-mouth/" rel="tag">Word of Mouth</a></p><p><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="150" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/walmartlogo2.jpg" alt="" />So many dumb moments in business, so little time. But <em>Business 2.0</em> mag has their picks for the <a href="http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/biz2/0701/gallery.101dumbest_2007/index.html">101 dumbest of 2006</a>.</p>
<p>Wal-Mart is #1, for hiring a big firm to create their "Candidate Wal-Mart" campaign. #2 is Northwest Airlines, for giving their employees a "How To Save Money" booklet after laying them off. #3 is the contest McDonald's held in Japan, with the winners getting free mp3 players with a virus on them. The rest of the top 10 are GM, Kazakhstan, Steve Wynn, <em>The New York Times</em>, Spirit Air, Porter County, and Comcast. </p>
<p>There are 101 in all, so grab a hot beverage and get comfortable. You can't see the entire list on one page, which is a little annoying, but there is a handy scroll function at the bottom.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/24/101-dumbest-moments-in-business/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/741377/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/24/101-dumbest-moments-in-business/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>bad advertising</category><category>business 2.0</category><category>Business2.0</category><category>comcast</category><category>general motors</category><category>mcdonald's</category><category>new york times</category><category>porter county</category><category>spirit air</category><category>wal-mart</category><dc:creator>Bob Sassone</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-24T11:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>AdAge In 60 Seconds</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/24/adage-in-60-seconds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/24/adage-in-60-seconds/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/24/adage-in-60-seconds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/adage-in-60-seconds/" rel="tag">AdAge in 60 Seconds</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/streaming-video/" rel="tag">Streaming Video</a></p><ul>
    <li><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/static3.gif"  alt="" />Ad exec Chuck McBride apparently created a rather <a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=114484">gruesome video</a> showing a massacre in the TBWA's San Francisco office. Seems he created the video as a way of sort of showing off what exactly he can do. <br /></li>
    <li>Current Senator and GOP Presidential candidate Sam Brownback is planning a new <a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=114496">set of discussions</a> between lawmakers and food marketers on the issue of advertising's role in childhood obesity numbers. Media companies that rely in large part on those food ad dollars have also been invited to participate. <br /></li>
    <li> Yahoo did better than expected in the fourth quarter of 2006 but, <a href="http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=114497">at the same time</a> doesn't want people to get too crazy with their expectations.</li>
</ul><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/24/adage-in-60-seconds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/741600/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/24/adage-in-60-seconds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-24T09:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Coke and Brit band settle out of court</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/23/coke-and-brit-band-settle-out-of-court/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/23/coke-and-brit-band-settle-out-of-court/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/23/coke-and-brit-band-settle-out-of-court/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/corporate/" rel="tag">Corporate</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a></p><p><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="150" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/joelele.jpg" />You might <a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/03/coke-ad-accused-of-plagerism/">recall a post I wrote earlier this month</a> about the British band 7 Seconds of Love. Lead singer Joel Veitch, he of the odd little Web site RatherGood.com and the mind behind those fun but creepy "sponge monkey" commercials for Quiznos, was upset about a South American ad for Coca-Cola that copied the band's song "Ninja" and the music video Veitch himself created for it.</p>
<p>Well, the band sued and Coca-Cola is now going out of business. Wait, I'm sorry, that's not what happened at all. Actually, the band and Coca-Cola settled out of court, and the ad for Coke Light has been pulled from television. If nothing else, this was a nice little bit of publicity for the band.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/B/BRITAIN_BAND_VS_COCA_COLA?SITE=TXDER&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/23/coke-and-brit-band-settle-out-of-court/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/741253/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/23/coke-and-brit-band-settle-out-of-court/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>7 seconds of love</category><category>coca cola</category><category>CocaCola</category><category>joel veitch</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>ninja</category><category>settlement</category><dc:creator>Adam Finley</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-23T19:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Congress might actually crack down on drug ads</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/23/congress-might-actually-crack-down-on-drug-ads/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/23/congress-might-actually-crack-down-on-drug-ads/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/23/congress-might-actually-crack-down-on-drug-ads/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/pills.jpg" />Don't tell drug manufacturers but they might not get the blind eye turned toward their marketing practices that they've become accustomed to the last few years. With a Democratic majority in both houses of Congress, their direct-to-consumer practices could be subject to increased scrutiny sooner rather than later. That's because the issue is likely to be the first addressed when hearings start on the policy of companies paying FDA fees to speed along the review of their drugs. Critics want there to be a lag time that the FDA decides on between a drug's development and its advertising of two years but the companies want to be able to decide that on their own. Those self-enforcement guidelines have led to interpretations ranging from six months to a year. All this comes as DTC spending by Big Pharma continues to hit all time highs.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/business/media/22drug.html?hp&amp;ex=1169442000&amp;en=fe3f056a15789d13&amp;ei=5094&amp;partner=homepage>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/23/congress-might-actually-crack-down-on-drug-ads/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/740324/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/23/congress-might-actually-crack-down-on-drug-ads/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-23T07:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Penguins are Kool (Cigarettes)</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/22/penguins-are-kool-cigarettes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/22/penguins-are-kool-cigarettes/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/22/penguins-are-kool-cigarettes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/online/" rel="tag">Online</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/streaming-video/" rel="tag">Streaming Video</a></p><p>I always thought that the term "Snow Fresh" was only used when someone was talking about peas, or a particularly randy comment by Frosty, but it was also once used when describing cigarettes.</p>
<p>In the old TV commercial for Kool cigarettes below, the guy tries to convince you that they are "as cool and as clean as a breath of fresh air," not a throat that's raw and smoky from too many cigarettes and too much coughing. It's amazing how many ads use ice and water and refreshing cool weather when trying to sell smokes.</p>
<p>The guy has a great "announcer" voice. I know I've heard it on many ads from that era. He probably got it from smoking.</p>
<embed width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pCxff1Dyy2w"></embed><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/22/penguins-are-kool-cigarettes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/740286/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/22/penguins-are-kool-cigarettes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>as cool and clean as a breath of fresh air</category><category>kool ad</category><category>kool cigarettes commercial</category><category>smoking</category><category>snow fresh</category><category>SnowFresh</category><category>vintage cigarette commercial</category><dc:creator>Bob Sassone</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-22T16:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>McDonald's uses Food Network to get inside your head</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/22/mcdonalds-uses-food-network-to-get-inside-your-head/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/22/mcdonalds-uses-food-network-to-get-inside-your-head/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/22/mcdonalds-uses-food-network-to-get-inside-your-head/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/op-ed/" rel="tag">Op-ed</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/streaming-video/" rel="tag">Streaming Video</a></p><p>The truth can finally be told: McDonald's is inserting single-frame subliminal ads into <a href="http://www.thatsfit.com/2007/01/22/food-network-running-subliminal-mcdonalds-ads">Food Network's programming</a>. If you don't believe me, just watch the video below. Soon we'll all be kneeling at the foot of a bronze Grimace statue while confusedly scratching at the horseshoe-shaped sutures on our shaved heads. Take heed!</p>
<p>Then again, maybe it was just a glitch, and maybe, just maybe, it was proved half a century ago that subliminal advertising <a href="http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a1_187.html">doesn't work</a>. However, the obvious answer is rarely as entertaining, so I like to imagine that somewhere in an underground bunker Ronald McDonald is ranting and raving like Dr. Strangelove and demanding more images of McDonald's be planted on television so he can build an army of mind slaves and take over the world. I shall lay down my life for my new bichrome overlord.</p>
<p><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LMzbwa6PvEE" width="425" height="350" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent"></embed></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/22/mcdonalds-uses-food-network-to-get-inside-your-head/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/740250/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/22/mcdonalds-uses-food-network-to-get-inside-your-head/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>ad</category><category>fast food</category><category>food network</category><category>mcdonald's</category><category>single frame</category><category>subliminal</category><dc:creator>Adam Finley</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-22T15:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Just because it's on YouTube doesn't mean the rules have changed</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/22/just-because-its-on-youtube-doesnt-mean-the-rules-have-changed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/22/just-because-its-on-youtube-doesnt-mean-the-rules-have-changed/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/22/just-because-its-on-youtube-doesnt-mean-the-rules-have-changed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/consumer-generated/" rel="tag">Consumer Generated</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/youtube810.jpg"  alt="" />Just because you put your video ad on YouTube does not mean you don't have to meet guidelines for truth and accuracy according to the National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus. The watchdog agency for the first time ruled on the existence of ads on video-sharing networks and said the rules aren't all that different. The ruling came as a result of a complaint from Euro-Pro, a vacuum cleaner maker who said that videos on YouTube from Dyson were inaccurate when making comparisons between the two brands. Dyson pulled the ad before the ruling. The case established an important precedent as more marketers use video sharing sites to connect with their consumer base.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticleHomePage&amp;art_aid=54142>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/22/just-because-its-on-youtube-doesnt-mean-the-rules-have-changed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/739140/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/22/just-because-its-on-youtube-doesnt-mean-the-rules-have-changed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>youtube</category><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-22T11:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Update: The Boston Globe is not for sale</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/update-the-boston-globe-is-not-for-sale/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/update-the-boston-globe-is-not-for-sale/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/update-the-boston-globe-is-not-for-sale/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/print/" rel="tag">Print</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a></p><p><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="150" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/boston-globe.jpg" alt="" />Even though advertisers seem to be fleeing newspapers and going to the web and other places, and despite an an offer from former GE chairman Jack Welch and advertising veteran Jack Connors, <em>The New York Times</em> says that <em>The Boston Globe</em> <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/globe/articles/2007/01/19/ceo_hints_times_co_wont_sell_globe/">is not for sale</a>.</p>
<p>Janet Robinson, the chief executive of the Times Company, told Boston business and political leaders yesterday that the newspaper is a very important asset to them and they seem things improving in the future. This comes the same week that the <em>Globe</em> revealed that they are laying off 125 works at the paper and the <em>Worcester Telegram &amp; Gazette</em>, and another 55 jobs would be outsourced to a firm in India.</p>
<p>Many people are unhappy with the stock structure that the paper has, and say that is one of the reasons for the financial problems.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/update-the-boston-globe-is-not-for-sale/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/739054/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/update-the-boston-globe-is-not-for-sale/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>boston.com</category><category>new york times</category><category>newspaper advertising</category><category>nyt</category><category>stocks</category><category>times company</category><category>web ads</category><dc:creator>Bob Sassone</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-19T17:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Watch the first banned GoDaddy ad</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/watch-the-first-banned-godaddy-ad/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/watch-the-first-banned-godaddy-ad/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/watch-the-first-banned-godaddy-ad/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/funny/" rel="tag">Funny</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/super-bowl-2007/" rel="tag">Super Bowl 2007</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/godaddy07banned.jpg" alt="" />GoDaddy <a href="http://www.godaddy.com/gdshop/superbowl07/view_ioy.asp">has put up</a> what it says is the first Super Bowl ad it's had rejected by CBS for inclusion in the Super Bowl. The spot doesn't feature either Candice Michelle or Danica Patrick but instead is just two white guys in their cubicles. One guy is showing off how easy domain registration is with GoDaddy by buying domains related to the other guy's family. It doesn't sound too risque until you see what the other guy's last name is and that the first guy keeps saying "I just did your dog/wife/mom." <br /><br />[via <a href="http://www.adrants.com/2007/01/cbs-says-godaddy-cant-do-its-mother.php">AdRants</a>]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.godaddy.com/gdshop/superbowl07/view_ioy.asp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/watch-the-first-banned-godaddy-ad/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/739123/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/watch-the-first-banned-godaddy-ad/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>godaddy</category><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-19T14:30:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>AdAge In 60 Seconds</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/adage-in-60-seconds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/adage-in-60-seconds/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/adage-in-60-seconds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/radio/" rel="tag">Radio</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/adage-in-60-seconds/" rel="tag">AdAge in 60 Seconds</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive Shifts</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/streaming-video/" rel="tag">Streaming Video</a></p><ul>
    <li><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/static5.jpg"  alt="" />The potential merger that's been floated between XM and Sirius has, unsurprisingly, been given a <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=114390">thumbs-down</a> by FCC chairman Kevin Martin. I can't imagine why he would think that the only two companies in a particular marketplace merging would create a monopoly. Oh, that's right, because it does.</li>
    <li>Online video is very cool and there's some awesome content being created for it. But it's still running into problems as an advertising medium because marketers <a href="http://adage.com/natpe07/article?article_id=114378">don't quite get it</a> yet and also because of some unintentional contextual missteps.</li>
    <li>Mary Minnick <a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=114386">is leaving</a> Coca-Cola just a month after being passed over for the number two position within the company. Minnick has been with Coke for 23 years and will leave at the end of February.</li>
</ul><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://adage.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/adage-in-60-seconds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/738905/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/adage-in-60-seconds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>coca-cola</category><category>coke</category><category>fcc</category><category>kevin martin</category><category>sirius</category><category>xm</category><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-19T09:30:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>The Office takes product placement to the next level</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/the-office-takes-product-placement-to-the-next-level/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/the-office-takes-product-placement-to-the-next-level/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/the-office-takes-product-placement-to-the-next-level/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/product-placement/" rel="tag">Product Placement</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/celebrities/" rel="tag">Celebrities</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a></p><p><em><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="150" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/easybutton1108.jpg" />The Office</em> is my favorite comedy on television right now. Did you see last night's episode?</p>
<p>Last week, Dwight quit Dunder-Mifflin so his secret girlfriend Angela wouldn't get in trouble for something he did for her, and this week we find out that he got a new job...at Staples! Now, ordinarily this wouldn't be much of a plot to talk about (though on most shows the character wouldn't have gone to work at a real company, they would have gotten a job at some fictional company), but it comes a short time after the episode that had a subplot of one of the Dunder-Mifflin employees buying a special (and real) <a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/06/staples-goes-to-the-office/">paper shredder</a>. An episode that had a <em>commercial for the shredder</em>. And now Dwight gets a job at Staples?</p>
<p>Is this going to far, or is everything fair in love and product placement these days?</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/the-office-takes-product-placement-to-the-next-level/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/738702/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/19/the-office-takes-product-placement-to-the-next-level/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>dunder-mifflin</category><category>dwight schute</category><category>DwightSchute</category><category>easy button</category><category>nbc</category><category>office supplies</category><category>paper company</category><category>rainn wilson</category><category>staples</category><dc:creator>Bob Sassone</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-19T08:30:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>AdAge In 60 Seconds</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/18/adage-in-60-seconds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/18/adage-in-60-seconds/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/18/adage-in-60-seconds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/agencies/" rel="tag">Agencies</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/adage-in-60-seconds/" rel="tag">AdAge in 60 Seconds</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/corporate/" rel="tag">Corporate</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a></p><ul>
    <li><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/static4.jpg"  alt="" />The commute into work for Time staffers had to be nerve-wracking to say the least. That's because <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=114377">today is the day</a> that between 150 and 250 of those staffers are going to be told they've been let go as the company seeks to trim operating costs. <br /></li>
    <li>Even though they named "The Consumer" as their Agency of the Year, AdAge takes some time to recognize some of the <a href="http://adage.com/columns/article?article_id=114290">great work</a> actual agencies did in 2006. That's very nice of them, I think. <br /></li>
    <li>2007 is going to be a <a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=114376">rough year</a> for marketers who target kids. That goes for food marketers especially but a number of other industries are going to wind up being scrutinized as well. </li>
</ul><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://adage.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/18/adage-in-60-seconds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/738288/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/18/adage-in-60-seconds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-18T11:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Help Woodsy spread the word, then destroy him</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/17/help-woodsy-spread-the-word-then-destroy-him/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/17/help-woodsy-spread-the-word-then-destroy-him/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/17/help-woodsy-spread-the-word-then-destroy-him/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/online/" rel="tag">Online</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/print/" rel="tag">Print</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a></p><p><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="150" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/woodsy-poster.jpg" />The hell?</p>
<p>Remember those commercials with Woodsy The Owl, the ones that told kids and adults to "Give a hoot. Don't pollute!"? I haven't seen them in a while, but I think the USDA Forest Service is still using the icon in their campaign. But they're also very serious about how people <a href="http://www.symbols.gov/woodsy/costume/oldcostume/destroy-costume.shtml">get rid of their Woodsy The Owl costumes</a>. You can't just throw them away, you have to incinerate the entire costume, and it has to be done in front of a USDA Forest Service official!</p>
<p>As some of the readers at <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/">Boing Boing</a> have wondered, why such strict rules? Are they updating the character and want no trace of the old model? Is it environmentally friendly to burn the costumes? Hmmmm.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/17/help-woodsy-spread-the-word-then-destroy-him/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/737696/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/17/help-woodsy-spread-the-word-then-destroy-him/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>forest</category><category>give a hoot</category><category>pollution</category><category>usda</category><category>woodsy the owl</category><category>WoodsyTheOwl</category><dc:creator>Bob Sassone</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-17T15:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>My UPS conspiracy theory</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/16/my-ups-conspiracy-theory/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/16/my-ups-conspiracy-theory/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/16/my-ups-conspiracy-theory/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/funny/" rel="tag">Funny</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/online/" rel="tag">Online</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a></p><p><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="150" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/upsman.gif" alt="ups" />The other night I caught a commercial for UPS and the <a href="http://whiteboard.ups.com/">Whiteboard</a> section of its Web site. The site's purpose is to show how UPS can help with all your needs no matter who you are or how often you deliver packages. It's not a bad way to raise interest, but listen to the music playing in the background on the site, and in the TV spots. That song is "Such Great Heights" by the band The Postal Service.</p>
<p>Here's my theory: a secret agent from the United States Postal Service infiltrated the ad agency and insisted they use a song by the Postal Service in the ad, thus subliminally telling viewers to go out and use the United States Postal Service instead of UPS.</p>
<p>A cover version of the song has also been used in commercials for M&amp;Ms. It's my belief that the USPS wants to lure everyone to the post office so its army of mail carriers can steal everyone's M&amp;Ms. </p>
<p>Make the truth visible. Power to the people.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/16/my-ups-conspiracy-theory/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/736917/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/16/my-ups-conspiracy-theory/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>postal service</category><category>song</category><category>such great heights</category><category>ups</category><category>usps</category><category>web</category><category>whiteboard</category><dc:creator>Adam Finley</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-16T15:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Ad firm drops GoDaddy just before Super Bowl</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/16/ad-firm-drops-godaddy-just-before-super-bowl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/16/ad-firm-drops-godaddy-just-before-super-bowl/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/16/ad-firm-drops-godaddy-just-before-super-bowl/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/agencies/" rel="tag">Agencies</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/super-bowl-2007/" rel="tag">Super Bowl 2007</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/agencychair5.jpg"  alt="" />Shine, the Madison, WI ad agency that had been tasked to create this year's GoDaddy Super Bowl commercials, has said it is <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=552920">parting ways</a> with the internet registrar company over "creative differences." No one, not Shine or GoDaddy, is offering anything in the way of comments on the decision beyond just the generic "it didn't work out" sort of canned corporate statement. That means we're all free to speculate just what those creative differences might be. <br /><br />What I'm curious about is where this leaves the ads that are in production. I'm assuming that GoDaddy is retaining ownership of the creative but it's just weird. I mean how do you walk away from something like this so close to game day unless you feel like you're getting screwed massively by the other party? I would have loved to have seen the meetings that led up to this. Seriously, this was a missed pay-per-view opportunity.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=552920>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/16/ad-firm-drops-godaddy-just-before-super-bowl/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/736868/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/16/ad-firm-drops-godaddy-just-before-super-bowl/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>godaddy</category><category>shine</category><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-16T11:30:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>AdAge In 60 Seconds</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/12/adage-in-60-seconds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/12/adage-in-60-seconds/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/12/adage-in-60-seconds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/agencies/" rel="tag">Agencies</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/radio/" rel="tag">Radio</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/adage-in-60-seconds/" rel="tag">AdAge in 60 Seconds</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a></p><ul>
    <li><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/static5.jpg"  alt="" />Deutsch <a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=114253">has landed</a> the media planning duties for Johnson &amp; Johnson's Tylenol brand. Deutsch currently handles creative duties for Tylenol and had previously done the planning work before briefly, you know, not.</li>
    <li>If it's Friday it must be time for a <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=114255">new round of speculation</a> regarding the potential merger between Sirius and XM. While it might be good for shareholders, am I the only one who thinks that a merger of the only two players in a particular market might raise some anti-trust concerns? It's not like they're lowering the number of competitors - they're eliminating competition outright. <br /></li>
    <li>The New York City Commission on Human Rights has <a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=114246">published</a> the minority hiring goals submitted by the agencies to try and make up for the inequality they've been accused of. <br /></li>
</ul><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/12/adage-in-60-seconds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/734806/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/12/adage-in-60-seconds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>deutsch</category><category>tylenol</category><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-12T09:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item></channel></rss>
