<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AdJab</title>
<link>http://www.adjab.com</link>
<description>AdJab</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Blogsmith, LLC. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>TiVo wants to do ratings</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/30/tivo-wants-to-do-ratings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/30/tivo-wants-to-do-ratings/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/30/tivo-wants-to-do-ratings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/dvr/" rel="tag">DVR</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/tivo_logo.jpg" />DVR subscription company wants to get into the TV metrics reporting business. It will begin offering data on both the programming and commercial viewing habits of its subscribtion base, data that would cover both live and time-shifted viewing. The new service, dubbed StopWatch, would provide second-by-second viewing data, something Nielsen has refused to do, likely because it hasn't figured out how to. Starcom has signed on as the first subscriber to TiVo's data. <br /><br />One final note to the ad executive who wonders about whether or not information such as this is "projectable." It's 2007. Nothing is really projectable because new things are vying every 15 minutes for the attention of your consumer. And with the proliferation of choice your audience is fragmenting. The problem, though, is that TV ad buying is still done mostly on guesses and instincts, before the shows actually hit airwaves. If the system were reversed, and advertisers were charged based on the actual performance of the show containing their ad and the ad itself, the world would be a very different place.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.adweek.com/aw/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003538673>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/30/tivo-wants-to-do-ratings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/744496/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/30/tivo-wants-to-do-ratings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-30T14:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Super Bowl Wrap-Up: 1/20/07</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/20/super-bowl-wrap-up-1-20-07/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/20/super-bowl-wrap-up-1-20-07/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/20/super-bowl-wrap-up-1-20-07/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/dvr/" rel="tag">DVR</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/consumer-generated/" rel="tag">Consumer Generated</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/super-bowl-2007/" rel="tag">Super Bowl 2007</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/bowl_xli.jpg" alt="" />If the TV networks think <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16637866/">long and hard enough</a> and convince themselves that the Super Bowl will remain untouched by DVR ad-skipping and that they can still charge outrageous prices for ads it just might come true.<br /><br />It's a little hard to reconcile the two main points of <a href="http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticleHomePage&amp;art_aid=54097">this article</a>, which is that on the one hand CBS is having a hard time selling the in-game inventory it has but, on the other hand, ad time is expected to rise in terms of sheer minutes.<br /><br />As I'd mentioned before, Toyota is <a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=114392">buying a pair</a> of Super Bowl spots to promote their Tundra pick-up. That's just part of a $100 million campaign to try and double sales of the model.<br /><br />Yes, the point of Chevy's contest for consumer-generated ads to air during the game is to <a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070119/AUTO01/701190406">attract real people</a> and not necessarily suck up to other ad folks. Thank you. We know that.<br /><br />Try and convince me - just try - that the <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/life/television/news/2007-01-18-couric-super-bowl_x.htm">announcement</a> of Katie Couric's inclusion in the pre-game broadcast doesn't have something to do with boosting viewership as well as ad prices.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/20/super-bowl-wrap-up-1-20-07/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/738412/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/20/super-bowl-wrap-up-1-20-07/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-20T12:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>KFC launching new Snackers push</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/15/kfc-launching-new-snackers-push/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/15/kfc-launching-new-snackers-push/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/15/kfc-launching-new-snackers-push/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/dvr/" rel="tag">DVR</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2007/01/kfc.jpg"  alt="" />KFC is once again trying to outwit all those DVR users out there. If you watch next week's premiere of "American Idol" you'll see a new campaign for their Buffalo KFC Snacker that challenges viewers to spot the difference between this year's spot and last year's version. The first 10,000 people who figure out what that difference is and correctly identify it on the KFC website get a $1 coupon for a free Snacker. This follows two previous efforts last year to foil DVR fast-forwarding by embedding messages in the ad that could only be viewed when slow-watching and hiding a punch line in the commercial.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://promomagazine.com/interactivemarketing/news/kfc_freebie_american_idol_premiere_011207/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/15/kfc-launching-new-snackers-push/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/734954/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2007/01/15/kfc-launching-new-snackers-push/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>kfc</category><category>snackers</category><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-15T13:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Microsoft's DVR targeted ad idea</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/22/microsofts-dvr-targeted-ad-idea/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/22/microsofts-dvr-targeted-ad-idea/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/22/microsofts-dvr-targeted-ad-idea/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/dvr/" rel="tag">DVR</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/streaming-video/" rel="tag">Streaming Video</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/video-on-demand/" rel="tag">Video on Demand</a></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/10/microsoft-patents-dvr-application-to-provide-targeted-advertisin/"><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="150" border="1" align="right" alt="microsoft" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2006/12/ms.jpg" /></a>Ads are almost always out-of-date when a show is recorded on a DVR (digital video recorder) device like TiVo or another set-top box by the time it is watched. Microsoft has now filed a patent for a way to serve "current" targeted ads when a recorded show is being watched, so that the ads on the "recording" will have a chance to impact viewers instead of being too old to matter. It is an interesting idea but makes little sense if the ad will simply be fast-forwarded through anyway. At least they get points for thinking, but in my mind, the other downside is that I like to see the old ads that were running when I originally recorded something. I revel in nostalgic ad non-sense I guess you could say. I suppose that is only an ad-freak's problem (like me), one that sadly many regular-old-tv-watching folks wouldn't have. Man, I am an ad-freak, I just noticed. I wonder if my wife knows. Shhhh!<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/10/microsoft-patents-dvr-application-to-provide-targeted-advertisin/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/22/microsofts-dvr-targeted-ad-idea/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/723202/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/22/microsofts-dvr-targeted-ad-idea/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>ads</category><category>current</category><category>DVR</category><category>microsoft</category><category>PVR</category><category>targeted</category><dc:creator>Ryan Carter</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-12-22T15:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Previously on WIN</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/12/previously-on-win/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/12/previously-on-win/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/12/previously-on-win/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/outdoor/" rel="tag">Outdoor</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/dvr/" rel="tag">DVR</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/corporate/" rel="tag">Corporate</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/celebrities/" rel="tag">Celebrities</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/video-game/" rel="tag">Video Game</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/previously-on-win/" rel="tag">Previously on WIN</a></p><ul>
    <li><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2006/12/beehive.jpg" />Blogging Stocks says that former New York mayor (and likely 2008 Presidential candidate) Rudy Gulliani has <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/06/circuit-city-hires-giuliani-to-promote-new-firedog-services/">been hired</a> by Circuit City to promote their Firedog home electronics expertise practice. <br /></li>
    <li>The guys at BS (heh) are also talking about how CNBC's Jim Cramer is hot on an outdoor advertising firm that is <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/11/cramer-daktronics-is-new-media-with-room-to-run/">well positioned</a> with new media technologies. Of course Cramer also likes very old-media companies <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/11/cramer-goes-old-media-with-lamar-billboards/">as well</a>.<br /></li>
    <li>Joystiq let's out a tremendous "well duh!" over an article that says games like Halo 3 are going to be <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/12/06/marketing-formula-determines-hottest-video-games/">big sellers</a>. They also mention that even games set in the distant past can get in-game ad dollars - it just requires a bit of creative thinking.</li>
    <li>PVR Wire passes on an early rejected ad from TiVo that <a href="http://www.pvrwire.com/2006/12/06/tivo-s-dropped-commercial-surfaces-on-youtube-tivo-taunts-netw/">mocks the very idea</a> of network programmers still having control over TV watching schedules. PVW is also giving us <a href="http://www.pvrwire.com/2006/12/07/more-details-on-tivos-program-placement/">more details</a> on TiVo's "program placement" product and passes along the discontent they and other people <a href="http://www.pvrwire.com/2006/12/07/dear-customer-comcast-hates-you-love-comcast/">are feeling</a> over Comcast putting ads on their program guide. <br /></li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/12/previously-on-win/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Previously on WIN</em></a></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/12/previously-on-win/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/714534/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/12/previously-on-win/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-12-12T17:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>TiVo maps out future that runs right between biggest rock in the and hardest place ever</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/12/tivo-maps-out-future-that-runs-right-between-biggest-rock-in-the/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/12/tivo-maps-out-future-that-runs-right-between-biggest-rock-in-the/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/12/tivo-maps-out-future-that-runs-right-between-biggest-rock-in-the/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/dvr/" rel="tag">DVR</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2006/12/tivo_logo.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />There's an old adage, it might even be from the Bible, that warns that no man can serve two masters. Unfortunately that's the position that TiVo increasingly finds itself in. While customers love the ad-skipping they can do with the service, the company is enjoying the revenue that comes from finding new and innovative ways to serve ads to those same customers. CEO Tom Rogers seems to be paying lip service to the former use while cozying up more and more to the ad industry. <br /><br />Rogers points to deals the company has done to deliver ads as a major revenue source for TiVo in the future. He wants to position the company in such a way that the ad industry works with it to develp new ways to serve ads that aren't skipped and don't fall into the 30-second spot model. I think this is a fantastic plan, assuming the long-range goal is to honk of a significant portion of the user base. A better model to pursue, I believe, is the one given a short mention at the end of the article: Position TiVo as a valuable resource of reliable data on consumer ad-watching behavior. The company likely has tons of data on what ads were watched, which ones weren't, which ones were watched multiple times and other such slices and dices.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticleHomePage&amp;art_aid=52308>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/12/tivo-maps-out-future-that-runs-right-between-biggest-rock-in-the/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/716701/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/12/tivo-maps-out-future-that-runs-right-between-biggest-rock-in-the/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>tivo</category><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-12-12T09:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>What came of Nielsen's commercial ratings meetings</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/11/what-came-of-nielsens-commercial-ratings-meetings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/11/what-came-of-nielsens-commercial-ratings-meetings/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/11/what-came-of-nielsens-commercial-ratings-meetings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/dvr/" rel="tag">DVR</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2006/12/television4.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />OK, here's the update on the Nielsen commercial ratings debacle that's coming after the research company held a meeting with agencies and networks to determine the best way to go forward:<br />
<ul>
    <li>The idea of counting only "live" data <a href="http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticleHomePage&amp;art_aid=52275">is dead</a>. All parties seemed to agree that "live plus two or three days" is going to offer the best set of data that both buyers and sellers can live with. This gives buyers a small enough window that their finely-timed campaigns can still be gaged for effectiveness but a big enough window that network sellers don't wind up throwing themselves out a window.</li>
    <li>Nielsen will <a href="http://www.adweek.com/aw/national/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003494560">provide raw data</a> to both agencies and networks so that they can figure out for themselves what information to use to create minute-by-minute ratings. This seems like a bit of Nielsen saying "Look, the two of you fight it out and we'll provide the weaponry" but maybe that's just me. Unfortunately this will start just a few weeks before the next upfronts so that probably won't be enough time for a common currency to be agreed upon. That has some buyers honked off. <br /></li>
    <li>40 percent of TV viewing is <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article.php?article_id=113668">now being done</a> via some sort of time-shifting, a much larger percentage then had previously been thought. That means that if the networks had once again caved and accepted rates based only on "live" data they would have lost about $600 million in 2007, which is getting up towards some serious money. </li>
</ul><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&amp;STORY=/www/story/12-07-2006/0004487562&amp;EDATE=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/11/what-came-of-nielsens-commercial-ratings-meetings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/715167/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/11/what-came-of-nielsens-commercial-ratings-meetings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>commercial ratings</category><category>nielsen</category><category>time-shifting</category><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-12-11T07:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>More people actively blocking ads</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/06/more-people-actively-blocking-ads/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/06/more-people-actively-blocking-ads/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/06/more-people-actively-blocking-ads/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/online/" rel="tag">Online</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/dvr/" rel="tag">DVR</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2006/12/denied.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />Twice the number of online users are using spam filters and internet pop-up blockers now than were two years ago according to a new Forrester study. Over half of US users use one or both of these technologies to save themselves from unwanted ads and emails. That number goes up to 81 percent when you just look at broadband users. <br /><br />Online tactics are just one facet of how Americans are choosing to tune out ads. The largest ad-avoidance tool used is the National Do-Not Call Registry that takes people off of telemarketer's lists. Then there's the DVR that allows people to fast-forward or skip entirely unwanted commercials. <br /><br />Forrester throws the ad industry a rope by encouraging marketers to find ways to enhance and facilitate the user experience rather than disrupt it. They also recommend a switch from the simple counting of ad views to a more action-based measurement system that shows how that ad impacted actual behavior.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=196601694&amp;cid=RSSfeed_IWK_News>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/06/more-people-actively-blocking-ads/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/713413/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/06/more-people-actively-blocking-ads/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-12-06T18:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Previously on WIN</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/06/previously-on-win/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/06/previously-on-win/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/06/previously-on-win/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/copycats/" rel="tag">Copycats</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/print/" rel="tag">Print</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/dvr/" rel="tag">DVR</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/celebrities/" rel="tag">Celebrities</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/consumer-generated/" rel="tag">Consumer Generated</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/streaming-video/" rel="tag">Streaming Video</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/previously-on-win/" rel="tag">Previously on WIN</a></p><ul>
    <li><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2006/12/bubblewrap.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />Slashfood is <a href="http://www.slashfood.com/2006/12/02/burger-kings-king-gets-creepier-sneakier/">creeped out</a> by an Xbox game from Burger King that features The King sneaking around forcing hamburgers down the throats of passers-by.</li>
    <li>Sony, according to TUAW, has co-opted Apple's "Mac Vs. PC" style and added a <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2006/12/02/apple-inspiring-non-pc-pcs/">third character</a>, the Vaio, in an effort to differentiate itself from the rest of the personal computing market.</li>
    <li>Joystiq raises a <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/12/02/circuit-city-false-or-stupid-advertising-you-decide/">couple of issues</a> with the latest ad from Circuit City promoting the Playstation 3.</li>
    <li>Joystiq also puts in their two cents on the Double Fusion/Take Two <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/12/05/take-two-signs-in-game-advertising-deal/">ad placement</a> deal.<br /></li>
    <li>Our friends at PVR Wire are pointing out how TiVo, by adding more and more advertising to the user experience, is actually <a href="http://www.pvrwire.com/2006/12/04/adverts-while-deleting-programs-tivo-adverts-getting-out-of-ha/">drifting away</a> from the whole point behind people's purchase of a TiVo.</li>
    <li>Break.com and their plan to pay people for short films gets <a href="http://www.dvguru.com/2006/12/04/earn-some-dough-with-your-video-on-break-com/">some press</a> on DVGuru.</li>
    <li>TV Squad mentions Comedy Central has <a href="http://www.aoltv.com/2006/12/04/comedy-central-orders-bush-cartoon-satire/">picked up</a> the animated series "L'il Bush." The concept started out as a series of shorts produced by Amp'd Mobile.</li>
    <li>Also at TV Squad comes word that the soap opera "Days of Our Lives" will be <a href="http://www.aoltv.com/2006/12/04/name-the-days-of-our-lives-baby/">holding a contest</a> asking viewers to name the baby of a main character.</li>
    <li>According to Blogging Stocks, KISS guitarist Paul Stanley <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/04/kiss-this-paul-stanley-peddles-guitars-at-target/">is selling</a> signature guitars at Target.</li>
    <li>Blogging Baby weighs in on the issue of pediatricians <a href="http://www.bloggingbaby.com/2006/12/05/ads-cause-anorexia-obesity-alcoholism-and-promiscuity-in-kids/">calling for a ban</a> on fast-food advertising to kids.</li>
</ul><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/06/previously-on-win/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/712518/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/12/06/previously-on-win/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>break.com</category><category>burger king</category><category>circuit city</category><category>comedy central</category><category>days of our lives</category><category>kiss</category><category>nbc</category><category>paul stanley</category><category>playstation 3</category><category>sony</category><category>target</category><category>the king</category><category>tivo</category><category>vaio</category><category>xbox 360</category><category>Xbox360</category><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-12-06T17:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>TiVo adds "program placement" ads</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/28/tivo-adds-program-placement-ads/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/28/tivo-adds-program-placement-ads/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/28/tivo-adds-program-placement-ads/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/dvr/" rel="tag">DVR</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2006/11/tivo_logo.jpg" />TiVo is adding yet another feature that caters to the advertisers who are worried that people are fast-forwarding through the regular ads. The DVR service is adding "<a href="http://www.pvrwire.com/2006/11/28/tivo-launches-program-placement-advertising/">program placements</a>" that will insert an ad at the end of a program when you're done skipping through everything. The advertisers will identify certain programs they want to their ads to and those ads will appear when the show is done. As PVR Wire says, this program seems to be predicated on the notion that people are ultimately as interested in the ads as they are the show they're watching. At least, based on the release wording, it seems like this is in some way a program viewers can either opt-in or opt-out of but how isn't clear.<br /><br />Considering that a new study shows <a href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx">30 percent </a>of US homes have DVRs in some way, shape, or form, it's increasingly important for advertisers to find new ways to reach TV viewers.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pvrwire.com/2006/11/28/tivo-launches-program-placement-advertising/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/28/tivo-adds-program-placement-ads/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/709041/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/28/tivo-adds-program-placement-ads/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-11-28T18:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Previously on WIN</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/28/previously-on-win/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/28/previously-on-win/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/28/previously-on-win/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/online/" rel="tag">Online</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/outdoor/" rel="tag">Outdoor</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/dvr/" rel="tag">DVR</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/corporate/" rel="tag">Corporate</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/video-on-demand/" rel="tag">Video on Demand</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/video-game/" rel="tag">Video Game</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/previously-on-win/" rel="tag">Previously on WIN</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2006/11/bubblewrap.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />Lots of good stuff from around the WIN world lately:<br />
<ul>
    <li>Slashfood explores 2007's likely <a href="http://www.slashfood.com/2006/11/25/food-trends-to-look-out-for-in-2007/">food trends</a>, including a heavy emphasis on the marketing of foods whose ingredients come from the Amazon region and other such exotic locales.</li>
    <li>An ad for the PSP game system popped up on MarthaStewart.com and PSP Fanboy has a <a href="http://www.pspfanboy.com/2006/11/24/sony-follows-nintendos-steps-and-starts-targeting-moms/">screengrab</a> along with with comments about how Sony's marketing the item to moms.</li>
    <li>Blogging Baby points out that rapper 50 Cent <a href="http://www.bloggingbaby.com/2006/11/25/double-standard-for-50-cent/">has a problem</a> with guns being OK on the posters for every movie but his own. </li>
    <li>TV Squad talks about the old sitcom "Bosom Buddies," with Tom Hanks and Peter Scolari playing two cross-dressing advertising execs, <a href="http://www.aoltv.com/2006/11/24/bosom-buddies-coming-to-dvd/">coming to DVD</a>.</li>
    <li>The growing rise of <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/11/22/advert-pseudo-games/">advergames</a> by companies is touched on by our friends at Joystiq.</li>
    <li>PVR Wire has a ton of good posts up, including a YouTube channel of <a href="http://www.pvrwire.com/2006/11/24/all-the-tivo-promo-videos-you-could-want/">TiVo promos</a>, this note on Charter Communication's new VOD advertising program, a study showing that DVRs <a href="http://www.pvrwire.com/2006/11/24/study-shows-that-pvrs-and-vod-will-not-be-the-death-of-tv-advert/">won't mean</a> the end of TV commercials, an ad from <a href="http://www.pvrwire.com/2006/11/22/radio-shack-series-2-tivo-commercial/">Radio Shack</a> for a Series 2 TiVo and a <a href="http://www.pvrwire.com/2006/11/22/uruguay-directv-commercial/">DirecTV ad</a> from Uruguay.</li>
    <li>Styledash wonders <a href="http://www.styledash.com/2006/11/27/the-right-hand-ring-good-idea-or-just-good-marketing/">just how much</a> of the excitement over the "right-hand ring" is due to consumer demand or marketing hype.</li>
</ul><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/28/previously-on-win/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/707429/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/28/previously-on-win/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-11-28T17:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Is Dewar's ad unskippable?</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/16/is-dewars-ad-unskippable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/16/is-dewars-ad-unskippable/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/16/is-dewars-ad-unskippable/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/dvr/" rel="tag">DVR</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2006/11/dewars1116.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />Fellow WIN site PVR Wire is reporting that some Time Warner Cable subscribers are having problems finishing off their whiskey. I'm sorry, that should have read they're having problems fast-forwarding through Dewar's Whiskey's commercials. The problems seem to be happening on DVR boxes received from Time Warner and may actually be a problem on any commercial featuring plain text that's on-screen for an extended period of time as the Dewar's ad does. If you're persistant and keep holding the forward button it does kick in eventually but it still seems odd. Dewar's denies its ads are skip-proof in any way.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pvrwire.com/2006/11/14/the-unstoppable-advertisement/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/16/is-dewars-ad-unskippable/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/703122/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/16/is-dewars-ad-unskippable/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>dewar's</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-11-16T17:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>NBC doesn't want you to TiVo "Heroes"</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/14/nbc-doesnt-want-you-to-tivo-heroes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/14/nbc-doesnt-want-you-to-tivo-heroes/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/14/nbc-doesnt-want-you-to-tivo-heroes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/dvr/" rel="tag">DVR</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2006/11/heroes1114.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />Steve Safran at Lost Remote catches an interesting little bit of voice-over work during a recent episode of NBC's "Heroes." The narrator says, "Don't hear about it in the morning.  Be there Monday night." That's an obvious ploy to get people to feel pressured to watch the show live and not on DVR the next day or the day after that. something that he rightly points out is all about ad dollars. The network needs to build live-viewing behavior in the audience now before they have to stop charging for time-shifted viewings.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.lostremote.com/2006/11/13/heard-in-heroes-promo/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/14/nbc-doesnt-want-you-to-tivo-heroes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/701737/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/14/nbc-doesnt-want-you-to-tivo-heroes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>heroes</category><category>nbc</category><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-11-14T17:30:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>New focus in the Great DVR Debate of 2006</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/07/new-focus-in-the-great-dvr-debate-of-2006/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/07/new-focus-in-the-great-dvr-debate-of-2006/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/07/new-focus-in-the-great-dvr-debate-of-2006/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/dvr/" rel="tag">DVR</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2006/11/television4.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />The VCR has emerged as the next point of contention in the debate over the reporting of commercial ratings numbers by Nielsen Media Research and the use of those numbers in television ad buying negotiations. That's because VCRs are much more prevalent than DVRs are and really allow for the same sort of time-shifting, albeit in a low-tech way. Nielsen, the networks and ad buyers all continue to argue over what sort of data to include in streams and chunks and bite sized portions, a debate that really has no foreseeable end in sight. As always, the stakes are pretty high since, without commercial measurement, ad placement and timing never really mattered. With it, though, those things become all important and the whole economic idea of television advertising is changed.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.san&amp;s=50764&amp;Nid=24890&amp;p=226286>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/07/new-focus-in-the-great-dvr-debate-of-2006/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/697622/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/07/new-focus-in-the-great-dvr-debate-of-2006/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>commercial ratings</category><category>nielsen</category><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-11-07T17:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>AdAge In 60 Seconds</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/03/adage-in-60-seconds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/03/adage-in-60-seconds/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/03/adage-in-60-seconds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/adage-in-60-seconds/" rel="tag">AdAge in 60 Seconds</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/dvr/" rel="tag">DVR</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/corporate/" rel="tag">Corporate</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/super-bowl-2007/" rel="tag">Super Bowl 2007</a></p><ul>
    <li><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2006/11/static5.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />It's good advice that Euro RSCG CEO David Jones was <a href="http://adage.com/ideaconference/article?article_id=112927">dispensing</a>, but I think he was going about it the wrong way. Jones said that creative types just need to get on with being creative and stop worrying about consumer research. He says marketers need to think of themselves as content creators and not marketers, but I don't think that's quite right. You're very much still marketers, but that's the content you're creating. <br /></li>
    <li>Les Moonves thinks that next year he and other network owners are going to <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=112924">start getting paid</a> by advertisers for commercials watched by DVR viewers. I'm going to not comment because my mother told me to not say anything if I couldn't say something nice.</li>
    <li>The NFL is about to break the <a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=112930">first spot</a> in the campaign encouraging people to create their own Super Bowl commercial. Yay?</li>
</ul><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/03/adage-in-60-seconds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/695782/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/11/03/adage-in-60-seconds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-11-03T11:30:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Live ratings guarantee leaves millions on the table</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/10/12/live-ratings-guarantee-leaves-millions-on-the-table/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/10/12/live-ratings-guarantee-leaves-millions-on-the-table/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/10/12/live-ratings-guarantee-leaves-millions-on-the-table/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/dvr/" rel="tag">DVR</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2006/10/television4.jpg" />Broadcast networks may have said "no thank you" to tens of millions of advertising dollars by agreeing guarantee upfront deals upon only "live" TV viewing numbers. While that number is purely hypothetical, that's the conclusion of an analysis of conversations and research done by MediaDailyNews with players inside the TV ad system. It takes, as the foundation of its figuring, the fact that delayed viewing via DVRs is adding about a tenth of a point on average to each network's ratings. If that number is accurate, and discounting any fluctuations in the asking price by a network, that means $86 million or so was lost per network. <br /><br />When the upfront negotiations were going on, ad buyers refused to include Nielsen's "live plus same day" or "live plus seven days" playback numbers under the assumption that those viewers would be skipping the commercials on their DVRs. Network execs initially were pushing for the "live plus seven" number but since not everyone could agree on what that looked like, they wound up with just the "live" numbers being used.<br /><br />So in actuality it's not that the networks didn't get $86 million. It's actually more accurate to say the ad buyers saved $86 million by not buying ad time that few would watch - money they can put toward other ventures such as online. You know, where it will actually do some good. You can also read a USA Today story on how much time-shifting has affected ratings <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/life/television/news/2006-10-11-nielsen-playback_x.htm">here</a>.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.san&amp;s=49451&amp;Nid=24151&amp;p=226286>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/10/12/live-ratings-guarantee-leaves-millions-on-the-table/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/683286/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/10/12/live-ratings-guarantee-leaves-millions-on-the-table/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-10-12T15:30:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Watch commercials even if you don't want to watch commercials</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/10/05/watch-commercials-even-if-you-dont-want-to-watch-commercials/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/10/05/watch-commercials-even-if-you-dont-want-to-watch-commercials/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/10/05/watch-commercials-even-if-you-dont-want-to-watch-commercials/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/dvr/" rel="tag">DVR</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2006/10/tivoxmencommercial.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />Peter Shankman took a picture of what could be the future of DVR advertising. When he tried to fast-forward his TiVo through a block of spots, a still image popped up promoting the same product being advertised in the commercials. Shankman wonders whether this kind of technology will change advertising. I don't think so, at least not until it's tied into some sort of direct engagement/response mechanism. That would bring it the same functionality as online advertising, which is more where the future of advertising lies.<br /><br />Now when I was watching some recorded shows last night I didn't see this happen, but it looks like this is tied in with the "TiVo Showcase" feature. That's based on the fact that Shankman's screenshot is of a commercial for the X-Men III DVD and that same product is being highlighted in the Showcase right now. Just speculation but it seems pretty solid.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://prdifferently.typepad.com/my_weblog/2006/10/tivo_thou_shalt.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/10/05/watch-commercials-even-if-you-dont-want-to-watch-commercials/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/679725/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/10/05/watch-commercials-even-if-you-dont-want-to-watch-commercials/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-10-05T13:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Previously on WIN</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/09/25/previously-on-win/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/09/25/previously-on-win/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/09/25/previously-on-win/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/outdoor/" rel="tag">Outdoor</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/dvr/" rel="tag">DVR</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/corporate/" rel="tag">Corporate</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/video-game/" rel="tag">Video Game</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2006/09/brick-wall.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />Once more into the breach dear friends...<br />
<ul>
    <li>Vladimir Cole at Joystiq <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/09/24/tgs-undermonetized-but-so-what/">lists</a> some reasons for the lack of advertising on the facade of the Makuhari convention center in Tokyo on the eve of a major gaming conference. He lists reasons from general ineffectiveness to being seen as not worth the effort as the motives for the lack of ads.</li>
    <li>Joystiq's Zack Stern <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/09/23/free-cdx-adventure-game-released-with-bbc-tie-in/">talks about</a> a cool cross-platform adventure/mystery that's designed to promote both the TV show component as well as a video game to play. The two media interact and add detail to each other in an interesting way, making sure that people who are doing both get the richest experience.</li>
    <li>Next Medium is a sort of Match.com for media producers to list spots for potential product placement that can then be searched by marketers and PVR Wire's Chris Tew has the <a href="http://www.pvrwire.com/2006/09/22/nextmedium-s-product-placement-answer-to-ad-skipping-pvrs/">details</a>.</li>
    <li>Tew also <a href="http://www.pvrwire.com/2006/09/22/sony-tries-out-alternate-ending-pvr-advert-for-bravia-television/">mentions</a> a new tactic Sony is using to try and foil DVR ad-skipping. To promote their new Bravia television set in the U.K., the company is creating alternate endings to a commercial, one geared toward men and another toward women. </li>
</ul><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/09/25/previously-on-win/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/674203/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/09/25/previously-on-win/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>BBC</category><category>bravia</category><category>next medium</category><category>sony</category><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-09-25T18:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>TiVo creates another ad-related alliance</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/09/21/tivo-creates-another-ad-related-alliance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/09/21/tivo-creates-another-ad-related-alliance/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/09/21/tivo-creates-another-ad-related-alliance/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/dvr/" rel="tag">DVR</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/corporate/" rel="tag">Corporate</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2006/09/tivo.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />More and more TiVo is trying to play nice with the advertising world. They've entered into various agreements with ad agencies who are seeking to get their client's messages to an audience that's skipping commercials more and more. <br /><br />The latest such deal is with Information Resources, Inc and seems to revolve around the idea of TiVo producing <a href="http://www.pvrwire.com/2006/09/20/tivo-teams-up-with-iri-to-offer-advanced-advert-statistics/">detailed commercial viewing statistics</a>. TiVo would use its existing technology to measure how people are viewing the ads and what parts are actually being watched and what aren't. That data could then be sold to media buyers and planners who can try to reconfigure their efforts. The program, called the IRI TiVo Consumer Insights Suite, seeks to draw a straighter line between ad watching on TiVo's DVRs and actual consumer purchases. That's always been a point of vagueness in advertising and data on that would certainly be of value.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pvrwire.com/2006/09/20/tivo-teams-up-with-iri-to-offer-advanced-advert-statistics/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/09/21/tivo-creates-another-ad-related-alliance/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/672338/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/09/21/tivo-creates-another-ad-related-alliance/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>tivo</category><dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-09-21T15:35:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Fox's single image TiVo ad gets smart</title><link>http://www.adjab.com/2006/09/21/foxs-single-image-tivo-ad-gets-smart/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adjab.com/2006/09/21/foxs-single-image-tivo-ad-gets-smart/</guid><comments>http://www.adjab.com/2006/09/21/foxs-single-image-tivo-ad-gets-smart/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/dvr/" rel="tag">DVR</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/networks/" rel="tag">Networks</a>, <a href="http://www.adjab.com/category/controversies/" rel="tag">Controversies</a></p><a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2006/09/20/business/EU_TEC_Britain_Immobile_Ads.php"><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="150" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.adjab.com/media/2006/09/fx2006-09-20_204817.png" id="vimage_1" alt="Fox" /></a>Fox got its thinking cap on and decided they had found a way to reach those ever elusive TiVo users who fast-forward right by all the commercials. The idea is a clever one. Fox will make a 30 second ad (in the U.K.) out of just one image. The image will depict the city of Providence, Rhode Island where the show "Brotherhood" is set and the show's logo overlaid on that. For all of us TV viewers who are too cheap or lazy to buy a TiVo or other digital video recorder (DVR) we will see the image, with dialog in the show in the background. For the DVR folks, even though they may skip by commercials quickly, they will still see the ad for a few seconds, which is more face time than most ads get on the highly advanced commercial-skipping systems out there installed on DVRs. My blogger's Kudos to Fox for thinking of this brilliant (I know, I think "Guinness commercial" too, is that weird?) idea. I guess it adds new meaning to "smart as a Fox."<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2006/09/20/business/EU_TEC_Britain_Immobile_Ads.php>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/09/21/foxs-single-image-tivo-ad-gets-smart/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/forward/672439/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adjab.com/2006/09/21/foxs-single-image-tivo-ad-gets-smart/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>DVR</category><category>Fox</category><category>pvrwire</category><dc:creator>Ryan Carter</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-09-21T14:28:00+00:00</dc:date></item></channel></rss>
